Keyword summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video947 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emergency Housing Voucher Funding results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 347 hits. Analysis detected 2,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (33,375 of 59,522 keywords). This Emergency Housing Voucher Funding is better (less manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
Emergency Housing Voucher Funding
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,788
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

44% percentile
025507510043.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos