Keyword summary
46%1 analyzed article/video672 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dian Palmer results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 261 hits. Analysis detected 1,903 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 67% (20,059 of 59,653 keywords). This Dian Palmer is worse (more manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group.
Dian Palmer
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
67%Dian Palmer (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,688
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510066.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Keyword 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Horn Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos