Keyword summary
33% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,475 analyzed words
BS Summary: These De La Espriella results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 287 hits . Analysis detected 3,333 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,900 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 19% (48,603 of 59,653 keywords). This De La Espriella is better (less manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group. De La Espriella
Keyword details
Total words: 5,900
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst