Keyword summary
7%2 analyzed articles/videos1,640 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cu Buffs results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 247 hits. Analysis detected 1,460 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,160 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of 1% (53,299 of 53,847 keywords). This Cu Buffs is better (less manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group.
Cu Buffs
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
1%Cu Buffs (selected)1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,160
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

1% percentile
02550751001.0% percentile
0.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Red Herring: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.7%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate