Keyword summary
99%2 analyzed articles/videos210 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Review Act results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.8% saturation with 595 hits. Analysis detected 5,230 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,660 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of 97% (2,242 of 59,653 keywords). This Congressional Review Act is worse (more manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group.
Congressional Review Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
97%Congressional Review Act (selected)10%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,660
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

96% percentile
025507510096.2% percentile
9.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 32.3%32.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 26.8%26.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 35.8%35.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 27.3%27.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 17.4%17.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 35.5%35.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 35.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 35.5%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 32.3%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 27.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 26.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos