Keyword summary
22% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,164 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Compensation Fund results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 990 hits . Analysis detected 6,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,382 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 20% (46,685 of 57,857 keywords). This Compensation Fund is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Compensation Fund
Keyword details
Total words: 12,382
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.3% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst