Keyword summary
99% 2 analyzed articles/videos 237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Disasters results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 634 hits . Analysis detected 4,005 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,343 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of 93% (3,887 of 51,952 keywords). This Climate Disasters is worse (more manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group. Climate Disasters
Keyword details
Total words: 2,343
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.5% percentile 7.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 27.1% 27.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 19.9% 19.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 27.1%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 23.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst