Keyword summary
⁠6%2 analyzed articles/videos1,960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These City Budget results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 2.6% saturation with 271 hits. Analysis detected 1,572 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,316 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (52,410 of 52,685 keywords). This City Budget is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group.
City Budget
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠1%City Budget (selected)1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,316
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

1% percentile
02550751000.5% percentile
0.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos