Keyword summary
69% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,676 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christina Paxson results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Halo Effect , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 625 hits . Analysis detected 5,409 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,509 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 63% (19,713 of 53,337 keywords). This Christina Paxson is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Christina Paxson
Keyword details
Total words: 5,509
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.0% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst