Keyword summary
57% 12 analyzed articles/videos 12,691 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Welfare results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 5,492 hits . Analysis detected 38,139 faulty-reasoning hits from 55,288 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 14% (51,505 of 59,653 keywords). This Child Welfare is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group. Child Welfare
Keyword details
Total words: 55,288
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score12 analyzed articles55.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst