Keyword summary
⁠54%2 analyzed articles/videos2,313 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago Architecture results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 662 hits. Analysis detected 4,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,819 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (35,323 of 59,653 keywords). This Chicago Architecture is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Chicago Architecture
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠41%Chicago Architecture (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,819
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

41% percentile
025507510040.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos