Keyword summary
58%1 analyzed article/video790 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Faltenovich results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Biased Writer Voice, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 320 hits. Analysis detected 2,942 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 69% (18,522 of 59,653 keywords). This Charles Faltenovich is worse (more manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group.
Charles Faltenovich
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
69%Charles Faltenovich (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,160
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

69% percentile
025507510069.0% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.0%Horn Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos