Keyword summary
11% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,876 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chad Williams results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 272 hits . Analysis detected 2,395 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,504 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 9% (54,690 of 59,582 keywords). This Chad Williams is better (less manipulative) than 91.80% of the peer group. Chad Williams
Keyword details
Total words: 7,504
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.2% percentile 1.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst