Keyword summary
52%1 analyzed article/video847 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catholic Homes results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 321 hits. Analysis detected 2,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 56% (26,519 of 59,653 keywords). This Catholic Homes is worse (more manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Catholic Homes
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
56%Catholic Homes (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,388
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510055.5% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos