Keyword summary
90% 1 analyzed article/video 577 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carol Wiener results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 398 hits . Analysis detected 3,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 82% (10,634 of 56,758 keywords). This Carol Wiener is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group. Carol Wiener
Keyword details
Total words: 2,308
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.3% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 17.2% 17.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst