Keyword summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video909 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bizarre Investigation results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 323 hits. Analysis detected 2,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (31,358 of 57,800 keywords). This Bizarre Investigation is better (less manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Bizarre Investigation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠46%Bizarre Investigation (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,636
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

46% percentile
025507510045.7% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.1%6.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos