Keyword summary
35%2 analyzed articles/videos1,081 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Binding Arbitration results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 734 hits. Analysis detected 4,801 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,416 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 16% (50,154 of 59,653 keywords). This Binding Arbitration is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group.
Binding Arbitration
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
16%Binding Arbitration (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,416
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

16% percentile
025507510015.9% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos