Keyword summary
35% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,081 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Binding Arbitration results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 734 hits . Analysis detected 4,801 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,416 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 16% (50,154 of 59,653 keywords). This Binding Arbitration is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Binding Arbitration
Keyword details
Total words: 9,416
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst