Keyword summary
82% 2 analyzed articles/videos 296 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bernard Smith results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 345 hits . Analysis detected 1,192 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,184 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 90% (6,303 of 57,991 keywords). This Bernard Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group. Bernard Smith
Keyword details
Total words: 1,184
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.1% percentile 5.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 29.1% 29.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 29.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst