Keyword summary
54%1 analyzed article/video573 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bailee Ann results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 252 hits. Analysis detected 1,871 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 57% (25,881 of 59,653 keywords). This Bailee Ann is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Bailee Ann
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
57%Bailee Ann (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,292
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510056.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos