Keyword summary
49%2 analyzed articles/videos1,173 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ayami Sato results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Indoctrination, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 382 hits. Analysis detected 2,957 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,692 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 60% (24,386 of 59,653 keywords). This Ayami Sato is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Ayami Sato
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
60%Ayami Sato (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,692
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510059.1% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos