Keyword summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video1,937 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Autonomous Agents results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 487 hits. Analysis detected 3,574 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (44,917 of 59,714 keywords). This Autonomous Agents is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Autonomous Agents
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠25%Autonomous Agents (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,748
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

25% percentile
025507510024.8% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos