Keyword summary
61%1 analyzed article/video443 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Auditor Dave Boliek results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 143 hits. Analysis detected 1,367 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 62% (22,828 of 59,643 keywords). This Auditor Dave Boliek is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Auditor Dave Boliek
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
62%Auditor Dave Boliek (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,772
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

62% percentile
025507510061.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.2%6.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos