Keyword summary
46% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,471 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Auburn Gresham results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , In-Group Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 1,126 hits . Analysis detected 6,598 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,884 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (43,395 of 59,653 keywords). This Auburn Gresham is better (less manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group. Auburn Gresham
Keyword details
Total words: 9,884
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst