Keyword summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 865 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anti Sharia Law results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 618 hits . Analysis detected 4,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 68% (17,937 of 55,192 keywords). This Anti Sharia Law is worse (more manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group. Anti Sharia Law
Keyword details
Total words: 3,460
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.5% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst