Keyword summary
18%2 analyzed articles/videos3,418 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anamarie Avila Farias results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 493 hits. Analysis detected 3,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,719 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (52,387 of 53,020 keywords). This Anamarie Avila Farias is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.
Anamarie Avila Farias
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
2%Anamarie Avila Farias (selected)1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,719
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

1% percentile
02550751001.2% percentile
0.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.0%0.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos