Keyword summary
11%2 analyzed articles/videos1,927 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Winehouse results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 746 hits. Analysis detected 3,109 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,304 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (54,490 of 58,332 keywords). This Amy Winehouse is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group.
Amy Winehouse
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
7%Amy Winehouse (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,304
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751006.6% percentile
1.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Straw Man: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Special Pleading: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate