Keyword summary
⁠29%3 analyzed articles/videos4,074 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Akron results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,841 hits. Analysis detected 5,137 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,296 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (54,224 of 59,653 keywords). This Akron is better (less manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group.
Akron
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠10%Akron (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 16,296
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

9% percentile
02550751009.1% percentile
1.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles16.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos