Keyword summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video506 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adaptive Reuse results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 194 hits. Analysis detected 1,060 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (31,578 of 59,653 keywords). This Adaptive Reuse is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group.
Adaptive Reuse
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠48%Adaptive Reuse (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,024
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

47% percentile
025507510047.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos