Keyword summary
83% 1 analyzed article/video 406 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Achilles Shield results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Framing Effect , and Anchoring Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 224 hits . Analysis detected 1,230 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,624 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 77% (13,698 of 59,023 keywords). This Achilles Shield is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. Achilles Shield
Keyword details
Total words: 1,624
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.8% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 13.8% 13.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst