Author summary
91%1 analyzed article/video496 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WBUR News results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 556 hits. Analysis detected 2,887 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 89% (1,005 of 9,149 authors). This WBUR News is worse (more manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
WBUR News
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
89%WBUR News (selected)6%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,984
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

89% percentile
025507510089.0% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 28.0%28.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 15.3%15.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.7%13.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Author 28.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Author 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Author 15.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Horn Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos