Author summary
68% 1 analyzed article/video 1,941 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Umair Khurshid results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,110 hits . Analysis detected 6,250 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,764 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 59% (3,776 of 9,027 authors). This Umair Khurshid is worse (more manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group. Umair Khurshid
Author details
Total words: 7,764
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.2% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 14.3% 14.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 8.4% 8.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst