Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Thomas Fazi results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 1,976 hits . Analysis detected 11,480 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,300 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,973 authors). This Thomas Fazi is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Thomas Fazi
Author details
Total words: 12,300
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.1% 16.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.4% 11.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst