Author summary
16%1 analyzed article/video461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sujata Srinivasan results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 662 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,482 of 9,078 authors). This Sujata Srinivasan is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Sujata Srinivasan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
51%Sujata Srinivasan (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,844
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510050.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 3.0%3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos