Author summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video145 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Richer results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 157 hits. Analysis detected 1,038 faulty-reasoning hits from 580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (720 of 9,074 authors). This Stephen Richer is worse (more manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group.
Stephen Richer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠93%Stephen Richer (selected)7%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 580
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

92% percentile
025507510092.1% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles580 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 27.1%27.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.0%11.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 15.2%15.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 12.4%12.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 12.1%12.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.3%9.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.0%14.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 27.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 15.2%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Author 12.4%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 12.4%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Horn Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.0%False Dilemma: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos