Author summary
â 73% 1 analyzed article/video 145 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Richer results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 157 hits . Analysis detected 1,038 faulty-reasoning hits from 580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of â 93% (720 of 9,074 authors). This Stephen Richer is worse (more manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group. Stephen Richer
Author details
Total words: 580
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.1% percentile 6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles580 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 27.1% 27.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 15.2% 15.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 12.4% 12.4% Fundamental Attribution E⌠Sitewide 2.7% Author 12.4% 12.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.0% 14.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 27.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 15.2%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Author 12.4%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 12.4%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Horn Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Nature: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst