Author summary
20% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,659 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sheila Regan results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 325 hits . Analysis detected 2,753 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,636 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 16% (7,711 of 9,109 authors). This Sheila Regan is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group. Sheila Regan
Author details
Total words: 6,636
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.3% percentile 1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst