Author summary
48% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,320 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rory Quealy results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 831 hits . Analysis detected 7,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,280 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 26% (6,776 of 9,118 authors). This Rory Quealy is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group. Rory Quealy
Author details
Total words: 13,280
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.7% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst