Author summary
67% 1 analyzed article/video 888 analyzed words
BS Summary: These PMH-C results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 363 hits . Analysis detected 2,590 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,552 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 56% (4,012 of 9,092 authors). This PMH-C is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group. PMH-C
Author details
Total words: 3,552
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.9% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 7.3% 7.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.5%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst