Author summary
17% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,859 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phoebe Huss results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 1,379 hits . Analysis detected 7,916 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,436 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 11% (8,179 of 9,158 authors). This Phoebe Huss is better (less manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group. Phoebe Huss
Author details
Total words: 19,436
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.7% percentile 1.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles19.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst