Author summary
â 42% 1 analyzed article/video 6,166 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Boghossian results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 1,984 hits . Analysis detected 14,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,664 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of â 18% (7,397 of 8,973 authors). This Paul Boghossian is better (less manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group. Paul Boghossian
Author details
Total words: 24,664
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.6% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles24.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst