Author summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos1,043 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Marley results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 939 hits. Analysis detected 4,698 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,022 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,639 of 9,160 authors). This Patrick Marley is worse (more manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group.
Patrick Marley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
83%Patrick Marley (selected)5%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,022
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

82% percentile
025507510082.1% percentile
4.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 14.4%14.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 7.6%7.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 23.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 17.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate