Author summary
9%2 analyzed articles/videos340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Morgan Womack results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, In-Group Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 460 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,360 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 52% (4,460 of 9,132 authors). This Morgan Womack is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group.
Morgan Womack
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
52%Morgan Womack (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,360
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510051.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.4%2.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate