Author summary
9% 2 analyzed articles/videos 340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Morgan Womack results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , In-Group Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 74 hits . Analysis detected 460 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,360 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 52% (4,460 of 9,132 authors). This Morgan Womack is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group. Morgan Womack
Author details
Total words: 1,360
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.4% 2.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst