Author summary
79%3 analyzed articles/videos3,758 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Crowley results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 1,603 hits. Analysis detected 13,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,032 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 38% (5,705 of 9,093 authors). This Michael Crowley is better (less manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group.
Michael Crowley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
38%Michael Crowley (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,032
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

37% percentile
025507510037.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles15K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.7%10.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.5%2.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos