Author summary
90%2 analyzed articles/videos1,374 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Malcolm Clark results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 1,745 hits. Analysis detected 8,901 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,496 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,794 of 9,127 authors). This Malcolm Clark is worse (more manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group.
Malcolm Clark
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
81%Malcolm Clark (selected)4%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,496
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

80% percentile
025507510080.4% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 31.8%31.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.2%12.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.3%9.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.1%13.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 31.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Author 10.4%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Straw Man: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos