Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Begley Bloom results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 358 hits . Analysis detected 3,449 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,686 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 22% (7,004 of 8,968 authors). This Laura Begley Bloom is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group. Laura Begley Bloom
Author details
Total words: 6,686
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.9% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst