Author summary
13%2 analyzed articles/videos898 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ken Mahan results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Overconfidence Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 243 hits. Analysis detected 925 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,592 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 24% (6,839 of 8,968 authors). This Ken Mahan is better (less manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Ken Mahan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Tabitha Mueller1%
0%Michael Fox1%
24%Ken Mahan (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,592
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

24% percentile
025507510023.7% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate