Author summary
73% 1 analyzed article/video 751 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katherine Dailey results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 553 hits . Analysis detected 2,958 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,707 of 9,131 authors). This Katherine Dailey is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group. Katherine Dailey
Author details
Total words: 3,004
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.3% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 12.7% 12.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.1% 15.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.3% 7.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.7% 4.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 18.4% 18.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.4%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 12.7%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst