Author summary
97% 1 analyzed article/video 1,834 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kat Stansell results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 32.8% saturation with 2,408 hits . Analysis detected 11,915 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,930 of 9,054 authors). This Kat Stansell is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group. Kat Stansell
Author details
Total words: 7,336
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.7% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 32.8% 32.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.0% 0.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.9% 7.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.9% 9.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Author 32.8%, sitewide 7.5% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.9%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.0%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Author 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst