Author summary
ā 93% 1 analyzed article/video 352 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inzamam Rashid results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Availability Heuristic , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 362 hits . Analysis detected 1,792 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ā 90% (901 of 9,027 authors). This Inzamam Rashid is worse (more manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group. Inzamam Rashid
Author details
Total words: 1,408
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.0% percentile 5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 16.7% 16.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 25.7% 25.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.5% 7.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 25.7%, sitewide 19.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 16.7%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 11.0%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Red Herring: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.7% Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst