Author summary
88%2 analyzed articles/videos589 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hillary Keverenge results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 361 hits. Analysis detected 2,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,017 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,417 of 9,154 authors). This Hillary Keverenge is worse (more manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group.
Hillary Keverenge
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
85%Hillary Keverenge (selected)5%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,017
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

85% percentile
025507510084.5% percentile
4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 14.4%14.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 17.9%17.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.1%10.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 12.3%12.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 14.4%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos