Author summary
21% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,154 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Gabriel results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Optimism Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 553 hits . Analysis detected 5,225 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,616 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 11% (8,154 of 9,075 authors). This Elizabeth Gabriel is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group. Elizabeth Gabriel
Author details
Total words: 12,616
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.1% percentile 1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst